art
Junior Member
Posts: 77
|
Post by art on Mar 24, 2015 8:57:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by northernfrostbite on Apr 13, 2015 12:02:21 GMT -5
AP has something to fight for. Nihilism by definition does not.
If you just are angry and want revenge, cool, I get that. But be honest about that instead of falling into a convoluted philosophical rationalization for that.
Insurrectionary AP asks, "How does this action support wild communities and our ability to be contributing members of an ecosystem?" Discretion is the better part of valor. Some debilitating actions, nuclear for example, would obviously not help foster healthy ecosystems. Other debilitating actions, especially when timed for maximum impact, can help foster wild communities.
Why wouldn't a nihilist view an ecosystem as just another "system" to destroy?
And don't blame AP if it appeals to hippies and activists. It hopefully is something that can broaden their perspective and inform a more wholistic praxis. Everyone has to start somewhere I guess, even if that place is phishy.
|
|